We collect cookies for vital website function and to better serve our customers. By continuing to browse you agree to the storing of cookies on your device. See our privacy policy for details.
Article from 2020-11-02
Katrina J. Holly, Jeffrey B. Williams, M.Sc., and Kirk W. Hering, Ph.D., Cayman Chemical
Cannabis is extremely complex, being comprised of several hundred chemical constituents that contribute to its psychoactive as well as medicinal properties. Over the past several decades, scientists have sought to identify and characterize these compounds to better understand the plant’s bioactivity. Many of these compounds, native to the plant itself, have been termed phytocannabinoids. Two of the most well-known phytocannabinoids are Δ9-THC and CBD. (Note: Cayman uses the dibenzopyran numbering system common in today’s literature for Δ9-THC and other tetrahydrocannabinols.1) Δ9-THC has been shown to be primarily responsible for the psychoactive nature of marijuana, resulting in the “high” experienced from smoking, vaping, or ingestion. CBD, on the other hand, is not psychoactive and has been found to have anti-inflammatory and pain-reducing activity in addition to other beneficial properties.
Extraction and isolation of phytocannabinoids from Cannabis inflorescences (flowers) requires extensive processing. During various stages of plant processing, many phytocannabinoids may undergo degradation through isomerization and/or oxidation. Formation of these byproducts can complicate the isolation of the desired phytocannabinoids and also degrade pure isolates over time if they are improperly stored. The pharmacological activities of these byproducts are not well understood due to the limited investigations performed. Identification of these phytocannabinoid degradation byproducts and the conditions under which they form may lead to more robust extraction and isolation methods, providing higher quality Cannabis products.
The most common phytocannabinoids consist of a resorcinolic acid core with an isoprenyl moiety positioned para to a pentyl chain.1 They are derived from an olivetolic acid precursor, which then undergoes enzymatic transformation into cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) and then cyclization via specific synthases to form cannabichromenic acid (CBCA), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid A (Δ9-THCA-A) (Figure 1).1 However, these phytocannabinoid acids are not particularly stable. They decarboxylate rapidly when heated but also gradually decarboxylate over time, even under ambient conditions.1,2 Such decarboxylation commonly occurs when Cannabis is smoked or during the extraction process, converting the non-psychoactive Δ9-THCA-A to the psychoactive Δ9-THC.2 The corresponding neutral phytocannabinoids that result from decarboxylation are the most commonly isolated and studied Cannabis constituents.
Figure 1. Biosynthesis of phytocannabinoid acids in Cannabis begins with a common precursor called olivetolic acid that then undergoes a series of enzymatic transformations. When exposed to heat, the phytocannabinoid acids readily decarboxylate into their neutral forms.
The process of extracting phytocannabinoids from Cannabis inflorescences is both time- and labor-intensive work. While each processor may follow a different method to obtain Cannabis extracts, the overall model of harvest, extraction, winterization, filtration, and distillation has been shown to provide isolated material with >90% phytocannabinoid content. After harvesting, Cannabis inflorescences are dried and removed from the harvested plant material. At this point some extractors choose to decarboxylate the acidic phytocannabinoids by oven-drying them at temperatures >125°C prior to solvent extraction. The plant matter is then extracted with solvents such as butane, ethanol, or supercritical fluid carbon dioxide. The biomass extract is cooled in a process known as winterization to induce lipid solidification, which is then removed by filtration. If necessary, the extract may be subjected to additional filtrations through clays or other solid support filter aids. Finally, the extract is vacuum distilled at very low vapor pressures and high temperatures, where decarboxylation occurs if it has not already. The lack of uniformity in standard operating procedures for the extraction and distillation processes provides multiple pathways for forming phytocannabinoid byproducts. For example, it is suspected that the acidic or basic nature of various filtration media may be responsible for byproduct formation.3 Additionally, the heating required for distillation increases the potential formation of byproducts through oxidative degradation. Identification of these byproducts provides a necessary quality control check for the extraction and distillation processes to avoid byproduct contamination.
Under basic conditions, the double bond in Δ9-THC isomerizes from the Δ9 to the Δ10 position, becoming conjugated to the resorcinol core.1,4 This can form two different diastereomeric structures of Δ10-THC: (6aR,9R)-Δ10-THC and (6aR,9S)-Δ10-THC (Figure 2). Neither seems to exhibit any abnormal behavioral effects according to animal studies.5 Under acidic conditions, CBD cyclizes to Δ9-THC and further to Δ8-THC, due to it being the more thermodynamically stable isomer (Figure 2). Δ8-THC exhibits similar pharmacological effects to Δ9-THC on the CB1 and CB2 receptors, except with less potency.1 Acidic conditions also drive the double bond of either Δ10-THC diastereomer to isomerize further to the Δ6a,10a position.4 This results in the formation of two potential enantiomers: 9(R)-Δ6a,10a-THC and 9(S)-Δ6a,10a-THC (Figure 2). Animal studies involving these two compounds revealed that the (S)-enantiomer produces a Δ9-THC-like behavioral effect and that the (R)-enantiomer produces no noticeable effects.5 Binding assays have shown that while both enantiomers exhibit partial agonist activity at the CB1 and CB2 receptors, the potency of the (S)-enantiomer is six times that of the (R)-enantiomer.6
Figure 2. Isomerization can occur under acidic (H+) or basic (OH-) conditions.
Some phytocannabinoids can be altered upon exposure to oxygen, generating various oxidative byproducts. Cannabinol (CBN) forms as the oxidative byproduct of Δ9-THC (Figure 3).1,7 Studies have shown that Δ9-THC oxidation occurs at a rate of up to 5% loss per month at room temperature.1 However, the rate of CBN formation is not equal to the oxidative degradation rate of Δ9-THC.7 This seemingly missing Δ9-THC could be explained due to the proposed presence of hydroxylated and epoxidized intermediates generated during the Δ9-THC oxidation process.1 Additionally, formation of Δ8-THC may account for part of the Δ9-THC loss as it can also be generated from Δ9-THC oxidatively.1 CBN exhibits very mild psychoactivity when compared to Δ9-THC.2 A heat map of the relative potency of various isomers is depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 3. Atmospheric oxygen oxidizes Δ9-THC to CBN and Δ8-THC, as well as to other intermediates not shown above.
Figure 4. Reported psychoactivity displayed in relative terms of potency.
In the presence of ultraviolet light, (±)-cannabichromene (CBC) undergoes [2+2] cycloaddition to form (±)-cannabicyclol (CBL) (Figure 5). Formation of CBL is based on the concentration of CBC and may serve as a marker for storage in the presence of light. Currently, no pharmacological data is available concerning the bioactivity of CBL.
Figure 5. Photo-oxidation induces a [2+2] cyclization in (±)-CBC, resulting in (±)-CBL.
Under pyrolytic conditions such as smoking, CBD is oxidized to cannabielsoin (CBE) (Figure 6).1,8 However, in rare instances, the carboxylic acid CBEA has been reportedly isolated from hashish, suggesting that some other form of degradation to CBE or CBEA may be possible.9 Currently, little pharmacological data exists concerning the bioactivity of CBE.
Figure 6. Pyrolysis of CBD leads to the oxidative formation of CBE.
Another oxidative series of phytocannabinoid byproducts is the richly colored quinone series. Phytocannabinoid quinones are designated with a “Q” and include those formed from CBD, CBN, Δ9-THC, Δ8-THC, (±)-CBC, and cannabigerol (CBG) (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Common phytocannabinoid quinones.
A forensic technique known as the Beam test utilizes the oxidative conversion of CBD to CBDQ, better known as HU-331, to detect the presence of Cannabis through treatment with a base to reveal a deep purple color (Figures 8 & 9).10 The Beam test conditions are typically selective for phytocannabinoids with two free hydroxyls on the resorcinol ring system. Other phytocannabinoid quinones are also known to be highly colored species and may be formed by alternative oxidative mechanisms. Scientists have been able to form Δ9-THCQ through electrochemical oxidation, but there is still the need for development of a reliable assay that can conveniently confirm the presence of Δ9-THC in a sample through rapid conversion to Δ9-THCQ.11 Some phytocannabinoid quinones have been found to have medicinal properties. Pharmacological research conducted into the quinone series thus far has revealed anticancer potential for HU-331, Δ8-THCQ (HU-336), and CBNQ (HU-345), as well as anti-inflammatory potential for CBGQ (VCE-003).1,12
Figure 8. Oxidation of neutral phytocannabinoids can generate their respective quinone species. The conversion of CBD to CBDQ is facilitated through the Beam test utilizing base-catalyzed oxidation. | Figure 9. Left to right: CBD before Beam test; HU-331 after Beam test; crystalline HU-331. |
The field of phytocannabinoid testing and research is experiencing rapid growth mainly resulting from the USDA Farm Bill legalization of regulated hemp products and from other changes to legalization at the state level. Many of these degradant byproducts have unknown or incomplete studies on their pharmacological and toxicological effects. Identification of these byproducts and a better understanding of the chemistry involved in their formation is paramount to providing the highest quality Cannabis products.
| Phytocannabinoid Guide: Biosynthesis, Naming, and Numbering Request the Lab Wall Poster | Cayman Currents Issue 34: Phytocannabinoids: What Is on the Horizon? Download or Request a Physical Copy |
![]() | ![]() |
1.Hanuš, L.O., Meyer, S.M., Muñoz, E., et al. Phytocannabinoids: A unified critical inventory. Nat. Prod. Rep.33(12), 1357-1392 (2016).
2. Banister, S.D., Arnold, J.C., Connor, M., et al. Dark classics in chemical neuroscience: Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10(5), 2160-2175 (2019).
3. Herr, R.J., Meckler, H., and Scuderi, F. Observed acidities of charcoals, clays, and common laboratory purification reagents in aqueous and organic solutions. Org. Proc. Res. Dev.4(1), 43-45 (2000).
4. Srebnik, M., Lander, N., Breuer, A., et al. Base-catalysed double-bond isomerizations of cannabinoids: Structural and stereochemical aspects. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2881-2886 (1984).
5. Järbe, T.U.C., Hiltunen, A.J., Mechoulam, R., et al. Separation of the discriminative stimulus effects of stereoisomers of Δ2- and Δ3-tetrahydrocannabinols in pigeons. Eur. J. Pharmacol.156(3), 361-366 (1988).
6. Rosati, O., Messina, F., Pelosi, A., et al. One-pot heterogeneous synthesis of Δ3-tetrahydrocannabinol analogues and xanthenes showing differential binding to CB1 and CB2 receptors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 85, 77-86 (2014).
7. Ross, S.A. and Elsohly, M.A. CBN and Δ9-THC concentration ratio as an indicator of the age of stored marijuana samples. UNPDC Data and Analysis Bulletin (1999).
8. Küppers, F.J.E.M., Lousberg, R.J.J.Ch., Bercht, C.A.L., et al. Cannabis—VIII: Pyrolysis of cannabidiol. Structure elucidation of the main pyrolytic product. Tetrahedron. 29(18), 2797-2802 (1973).
9. Shani, A. and Mechoulam, R. Cannabielsoic acids: Isolation and synthesis by a novel oxidative cyclization. Tetrahedron30(15), 2437-2446 (1974).
10. Caprioglio, D., Mattoteia, D., Pollastro, F., et al. The oxidation of phytocannabinoids to cannabinoquinoids.J. Nat. Prod.83(5), 1711-1715 (2020).
11. Darzi, E.R. and Garg, N.K. Electrochemical oxidation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol: A simple strategy for marijuana detection. Org. Lett.22(10), 3951-3955 (2020).
12. Kogan, N.M., Rabinowitz, R., Levi, P., et al. Synthesis and antitumor activity of quinonoid derivatives of cannabinoids. J. Med. Chem.47(15), 3800-3806 (2004).
Cayman Chemical
About UsManagement TeamCareersBuy Cayman GearIntellectual Property ProgramsContact UsConferences
Conference ScheduleContact Info
Cayman Chemical1180 East Ellsworth RoadAnn Arbor, Michigan 48108 USA